<optgroup id="e0qke"><progress id="e0qke"></progress></optgroup>
    <th id="e0qke"></th>
    1. <th id="e0qke"></th>
    2. <del id="e0qke"><form id="e0qke"></form></del>



          書評(píng)檢索:     發(fā)表書評(píng)


          《專利侵權(quán)判定-中美法條與案例比較研究》書評(píng) ——

          J. Chen 2002-1-8 8:07:57

          A pretty good book. Soem aspect can be improved is that the citations and case names of U.S. court decisions are translated into Chinese,which make it difficult to do legal research in English.

          ========================================= 本欄書評(píng)僅代表撰寫者個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)========================================





            <optgroup id="e0qke"><progress id="e0qke"></progress></optgroup>
            <th id="e0qke"></th>
            1. <th id="e0qke"></th>
            2. <del id="e0qke"><form id="e0qke"></form></del>
                  亚洲综合在线视频 | 中文字幕人乱码中文字的预防方法 | 久草久久| 人人干人人摸人人爱 | 麻豆三级片 |